Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

INADEQUACY OF EMPIRICIST WAY OF LANGUAGE LEARNING AND KRESHEN’S ACQUISITION THEORY (Pages 207-212) by Dr. B. Thenmalar Bharathi in THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SPECIALIST / ISSN: 2350-1499 (Online); 2350-0751 (Print)

DB Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
528 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

There is a need for ending the controversy on whether empiricist analysis may be made of the various theories of learning languages. It may be in special reference to English of universal connectivity and versatility. Oxford Dictionary gives the following definition of empiricism it is: ‘based on observation or experiment, not on theory’. While making empirical study of origin of language, observation is made in qualitative perspectives. Thus knowing language in its feel is experiential. Study of origin of language will be in functional approach. It is conditioned by the content of the linguistic material commonly known as language code. Following this experimental study is made on course of development of language. It will be in quantitative perspectives as much as it will be in experimental approach depending upon the form of language. Key-words: empiricist analysis, theories of learning languages, universal connectivity and versatility, linguistic material etc

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: February 03, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my side
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please do the needful
DB
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1