Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

FEMALE DEVELOPMENT IN GOING HOME BY LAKSHMI KANNAN (Pages 18- 22) by K. Mugeshpillai1 and M. Soundhararajan2 in THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SPECIALIST / ISSN: 2350-1499 (Online); 2350-0751 (Print)

KM Updated
 
3.4
 
3.6 (1)
688 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

Hippolyte Taine, a French critic and historian uses the words "race, milieu et moment” in order to understand the collective consciousness of an age. The German philosopher Hegel uses the term “Zeitgeist” to represent the same. Both these philosophers are opposed to the Great Man theory that believes in the society’s mindset collectively working in a particular fashion. The art is always seen as the representation of society. Thus, in contemporary detective fiction, the sleuth represents an attitude that neither cares about morality, nor worries about immorality. Both morality and immorality are considered métarécit in the postmodern world. This genre of detective fiction, with unfinished cases, moral ambiguity, cynical approach and narcissistic tendency is termed anti - detective. Tamil cinema has undergone a change in its attitude in the past two years pertaining to thriller movies. The paper considers this transformation in a light of anti - detective mentality, zeitgeist and social reality in contemporary Tamil detective movies like D - 16, Maayavan and Vikram Vedha that are subjected to introspection in this paper. Key Words: Anti - detective Cinema, Moral ambiguity, Zeitgeist, Amoral representations, debunking of canonical representations.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
4.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by us and colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Please consider
KM
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1