Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

ERROR ANALYSIS PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN IMPROVING WRITING SKILLS OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS: A CASE STUDY (Pages 01-25) by Bishnu Paramguru Mahapatra, in THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SPECIALIST / ISSN: 2350-1499 (Online); 2350-0751 (Print)

BP Updated
 
3.4
 
3.3 (1)
499 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

Teaching writing is not every ones cup of tea. Teachers explain different methodologies to the students of Engineering like how to write an Email, Report, Essays, Specimen expansions etc. properly. Generally students take half an hour or even more than that to write the assigned task. The outcome of the task is completely opposite to the anticipation of the Teacher. Students end up without producing task effectively, concretely, coherently and precisely because of their wrong syntax. The tasks the teacher usually go through to check its productivity finds the task is replete with different grammatical errors and the content lacks proper illustration etc. In turn students demand more time to write the task, stating they do not know how to illustrate their ideas with proper syntax. At this stage the teacher feels an analysis of grammatical errors and its remedial measure to minimize the grammatical error will help the students to produce the content effectively and correctly. Keywords: Syntax, Anticipation, Remedial measure, Content.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: February 04, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me and friends
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please consider
BP
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1