Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

TEST-WISENESS TECHNIQUES USED BY STUDENTS IN TAKING CLOZE-TESTS... (Pages 01-10) by Dr. Parul Shantilal Popat in THE INTERNATIONAL MANAGER / ISSN: 2348-9413 (Online); 2348-9405 (Print)

DP Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
441 0 0 0 1 0
Write Review Add to favorites Follow

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year
2015 2nd Quarter
Author Name
Dr. Parul Shantilal Popat

Testing has always remained at the core of the language learning because it helps decide the level of the learners. Language Testing has witnessed very significant developments in recent years. This has, in turn, led to a major reconsideration of the way language tests are designed, written, analyzed, administered, scored, and used. World testing bodies, therefore, constantly strive to keep up with such developments so that they can offer more reliable and effective examinations. Wilson Taylor’s cloze test is one such work on the testing of reading ability of the target group. The present paper analyses various techniques used by the testees to fill in the blanks in the cloze passages given to them. The study was undertaken to ascertain the reliability and validity of cloze test as a test to test reading ability as an ongoing process. The study reveals that as compared to other reading comprehension test, a cloze test is much more reliable. However, there are instances wherein the testees have been found to give correct answer without comprehending the passages. Keywords: cloze test, reading ability, test-wiseness techniques, language testing

Editor reviews

1 reviews

ReviewedbyEditorialBoard
(Updated: February 01, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfillsallcriteria
admin
#1 Reviewer 1401 reviews
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
My honest review
DP
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
      Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Category

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1