Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

STATUS OF AVIAN COLLECTION IN NATURAL HISTORY SECTION OF STATE MUSEUM LUCKNOW: A CASE STUDY (Pages 131-138) by myuser in THE INTERNATIONAL MANAGER / ISSN: 2348-9413 (Online); 2348-9405 (Print)

myuser Updated
 
3.7
 
3.6 (1)
632 0 0 0 0 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
State Museum Lucknow is the fourth oldest Museum of India established in 1863. Present study is done to provide detailed and correct information about this rich and rare avian collection and to suggest what to be done for its safeguarding. The General Accession Register, Accession Cards and Field Slips of State Museum Lucknow, was the primary source of information used for the development of documentation of avian collection of State Museum Lucknow. The avian collection of State Museum Lucknow is very rich and valuable in terms of research and display and there is only limited scope of further extension of the collection in the near future. The conservation status of avian collection of State Museum Lucknow also studied in order to provide detailed and correct information about condition and for conservation of the rich and rare avian collection preserved in State Museum Lucknow. A standardized documentation system will not only help museum staff to manage the collection but will also contribute more information to the future scientific researches.
Keywords: State Museum Lucknow, rich and rare avian collection, Accession Cards and Field Slips, standardized documentation system, scientific researches etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: February 26, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
4.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me today
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Hope this will be published
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1