Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF LATENT VARIABLES EFFECTING EMPLOYEE’S QUALITY OF WORK LIFE: A STUDY OF PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS (Pages 20-26) by Ms. Kamlesh Rani in THE INTERNATIONAL MANAGER / ISSN: 2348-9413 (Online); 2348-9405 (Print)

MK Updated
 
3.4
 
3.7 (1)
488 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year
Author Name

Quality of work life is an essential aspect in motivating and increasing the productivity of the employees that helps the organisation to achieve its objectives. Present study is conducted to find the correlation between the perceived quality of work life and the demographic characteristics (Age, Education, Experience and Pay). The data was collected form five public sector banks from 250 employees by questionnaire. Factor analysis and bivariate correlation technique has been used to draw out the results. Ten factor of quality of work life have been identified namely job satisfaction, life satisfaction, Intrinsic job motivation, high order need strength and health & safety provisions, intrinsic job characteristics, privacy and treatment, self-rated anxiety, training practices and social image, social integration and growth opportunities and work involvement. Life satisfaction is negatively correlated with age, experience and salary. Work involvement found significant and positively correlated with experience and salary. All remained factors have no significant correlation with studied demographic variables. Keywords: Quality of Work life, QWL, Employees.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: March 03, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
4.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me alone
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
My humble request
MK
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1