Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

BINARY AFRICAN DECOLONIZATION: AN EXPLANATION OF THE DICHOTOMOUS NATURE OF POST-COLONIAL DEVELOPMENT AS A RESULT OF COLONIST INTERVENTION (Pages 42-48) by Mr. Ameen M. Basha in THE INTERNATIONAL MANAGER / ISSN: 2348-9413 (Online); 2348-9405 (Print)

MA Updated
 
3.3
 
3.6 (1)
530 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

In the age of colonization, powerful European states sought to expand their domain by creating colonies around the world. As such, many African nations experienced colonial rule for hundreds of years. However, inevitable collapses of colonial rule took place, resulting in a wave of independence and freedom. Colonial powers often retreated over a short period of time, leaving behind nations without experienced leaders. In the aftermath of colonial rule, cultural and religious divisions were created among the indigenous populations, indigenous culture had been repressed, and economies were decimated. Decolonization, which is the transition from colonial to indigenous rule, appears to take one of two flavours. These decolonization processes are described and contrasted herein, culminating in the argument that the method of the deposition of colonial rule is a strong determinant of the postcolonial history of an ex-colonial nation. Keywords: colonization, independence and freedom, indigenous rule, postcolonial history, ex-colonial nation etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: February 25, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
4.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Let me know further
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1