Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS ON THE SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE LABOURERS IN LABOUR WELFARE MEASURES IN TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (MADURAI DIVISION – I) MADURAI (Pages 143-155) by Ms. S. Porkodi* and Dr. (Mrs.) T.V. Anandi** in THE INTERNATIONAL MANAGER / ISSN: 2348-9413 (Online); 2348-9405 (Print)

MS Updated
 
3.7
 
3.4 (1)
481 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

This paper provides an overview of the theoretical positions of the contending perspectives as well as a survey of the empirical evidence on labour welfare measure in Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC). It clearly emerges from our discussion that the theoretical basis for the advocacy of blanket labour welfare measure is rather weak. Our empirical analyses that examine the satisfaction level of labourers in labour welfare measure in TNSTC. The paper also examines the result of above study. Furthermore, it clearly emerges that many of these empirical studies are methodologically and statistically seriously flowed. Keywords: empirical evidence, labour welfare measure, TNSTC, empirical analyses etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

ReviewedbyEditorialBoard
(Updated: February 06, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfillsallcriteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by us at an instant
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
we have taken more care to prepare this
MS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1