Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

THE RHETORIC OF FICTION (Pages 303-316) by Dr. Sushant Chaturvedi in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

DS Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
538 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/4Th.Qr-31/303.316/91
Publication Year

A number of scholars have been drawn to Wayne C. Booth’s The Rhetoric of Fiction. In fact responses have continued even till the twenty-first century. Walter Jost, Robert D. Denham, Eric Gilder, James Phelan, Dan Shen, and Arnt Lykke Jacobsen are some scholars who have published articles directly related to The Rhetoric of Fiction in journals in the decade 2001-2010. Apart from these there are books published in the twenty-first century that have devoted some pages to this book and its significance. The number of articles published in the decades just before the turn of the century is of an even greater number. For a book written in 1961 to have received so much attention till the current time is no small matter. Anyone who writes on the theory of fiction now or even in the next several decades to come cannot ignore Booth. Scholars can disagree with Booth in order to raise their academic reputation, but they cannot ignore him, or indeed should not, if they are writing on the theory of fiction. Such has been the impact of this single book on the theory of fiction. It is high time someone puts together Booth’s ideas along with the critical responses he has received. One of the significant contributions of this paper can be seen to be in this direction. Key Words: Rhetoric, kind of perception, showing, realism, dramatic rendering, romantic emotionalism, literal naturalism etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 12, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
My quick review
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
This is of keen understanding
DS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1