Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

THE IDEA OF 'THE EYES AS UNCANNY': PIVOTAL FOR FEMALE IDENTITY IN TONI MORRISON’S 'SONG OF SOLOMON' (Pages 187-195) by Dr. Suneetha Yedla in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

DS Updated
 
3.6
 
3.4 (1)
502 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/4Th.Qr-20/187.195/80
Publication Year

African-Americans always had a nervous frame of mind in the way of life with the White ideal of beauty. Black women usually have been exaggerated by the issues of skin color, facial features and hair styles. To attain high attractive white standard of beauty most of black women tried mysterious things to satisfy black-male expectations. Toni Morrison, an African- American women writer depicted black women characters as the representatives who search for Female Identity in the novel Song of Soloman (1977). The main thought presented in this article is that how the idea of eyes as uncanny as pivotal for female identity has been proven through ‘Hagar’. Key Words: Female identity, uncanny, pivotal, physical features, self-mutilation, detriment.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 11, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me and colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please do the needful
DS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1