Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION IN RABINDRANATH TAGORE’S 'MUKTA-DHARA' (Pages 93-100) by in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

G Updated
 
3.3
 
3.7 (1)
894 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2016/3Rd.Qr-10/93.100/365
Publication Year

Rabindranath Tagore was the one writer who first gained for modern India, a place on the world literary scene. The award of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1913 was but the beginning of a drama of recognition on a global scale for which they cannot be any parallels in literary history. He was a genius par excellence and a versatile man. In Mukta-Dhara, written in 1922, the dramatist condemns technology, which is divorced from religion and humanity. Mukta-Dhara is the name of a river and it is symbolic of the human quest for freedom. The central conflict in the play emerges between the offensive force of Uttarakut and the defensive force of Shiv-taryans. Mukta-Dhara, the river is the bone of contention between these parties. The water of this river assumes many layers of significance in the play. The King of Uttarakut plans to control the economic prosperity of the people of Shiv-tarai by building a dam across the river. He wants to hoard the water for his own kingdom. King Ranjit’s political power, combined with selfishness is further assisted by science and technology. Throughout the play, the contrast between science and religion is maintained. Religion recognizes the presence of God and the meaning, beauty and purpose of his creation. Science challenges and even competes with it. The tension between science and religion; parochialism and humanism; feudalism and democracy and between bondage and freedom is finally resolved by the triumph of the latter over the former. Abhijit, who symbolizes religion, broad humanism, spiritual democracy and liberation, triumphs over King Ranjit, who stands for science, parochialism, feudalism, short-sightedness, exploitation, suppression and bondage. Prince Abhijit becomes a martyr in the cause of empirical freedom as well as spiritual freedom. Keywords: dramatist condemns technology, quest for freedom, offensive force, defensive force, economic prosperity, science & religion, parochialism &humanism, feudalism & democracy, bondage &freedom, spiritual democracy &liberation, spiritual freedom etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
My quick review
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Hope this will be published at the earliest
DR
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1