Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

PREDESIGNED ROLES AND DESIRED INDEPENDENCE IN SELECT NOVELS OF ANITA DESAI AND MARGARET LAURENCE (Pages 340-346) by Ms. S. Patchainayagi* and Dr. S. Parvin Banu** in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MS Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
482 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/3Rd.Qr-34/340.346/52
Publication Year

World today has a set of norms to which the people generally adhere. The problem ascends when one cannot ensue with the designed roles as they are haunted by their desired independence. Loneliness is not something unique, but is, in fact, a characteristic of the society. This paper is based on Anita Desai and Margaret Laurence, how they have handled the gender issues in their works, “cry the peacock” and “The Stone Angel”. Maya of is a hypersensitive and a submissive, married to a busy, practical lawyer Gautam which in turn makes her a murderers, Whereas Hagar is highly ambitious who takes decisions by herself. Both the women are not understood by the people around them which cause a disturbed situation. Both Maya and Hagar lack companionship, a person to share the inner feelings, not because they are wrong but because of the gender inequality that prevails in the society. Key Words: predesigned roles, desired independence, settings and backdrops, perception, feminine community, Politics for Survival, patriarchal culture

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 09, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Our quick review
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Let us know further
MS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1