Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

LIKE TWO VIRGINS: PIOUS, POLITICAL AND PERVERSE SUBTEXTS IN CHAUCER’S 'THE WIFE OF BATH' AND MADONNA CICCONE’S 'LIKE A VIRGIN' (Pages 39-60) by Dr. Hartmut Heep in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

DH Updated
 
3.6
 
3.4 (1)
528 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2015/3Rd.Qr-04/39.60/271
Publication Year
Author Name

Geoffrey Chaucer’s medieval, fictitious wife of Bath rekindled the debate about women who were forced to live by their hymen as virgin brides before marriage or as sequestered nuns. Both options precluded sexual pleasure and forced female existence into narrow, male-dominated social parameters. Excluded from the economic arena, medieval women were relegated to a subservient existence within the home. In the form of Alison, the wife of Bath, Chaucer presents a radically different role model for women that breaks out of medieval conventions. The video artist Madonna Ciccone pushed social and biological concepts related to virginity even further by redefining male-based linguistic signifiers, such as “virgin” and “whore.” Through a cleverly arranged visual text, she slips away from male focused sexuality into her own postmodern, autoerotic self-fulfillment. This study will focus on two different representations of female identities outside of hegemonic norms: Geoffrey Chaucer’s “Wife of Bath” and the artist Madonna.. Keywords: Gender Studies, Popular Culture, Feminist Theory, Women’s Studies, Medieval Studies.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

ReviewedbyEditorialBoard
(Updated: February 03, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfillsallcriteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Let me know further

DH
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1