Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

LANGUAGE AND CULTURE: CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ETIC FRAMEWORK AND EMIC VIEW (Pages 137-147) by Ms. Apeksha in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MA Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
609 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/3Rd.Qr-13/137.147/31
Publication Year
Author Name

Correspondence has to be established to trace the roots of philology and associate it with anthropology to assess relationship between language family and ethnic groups. Language can be coded and decoded and reduced to writing for permanent memory and thought preservation. It cannot be transmitted genetically and hence there is no hereditary language. Language depends upon signs and symbols. Signs indicate the existence of an object such as clouds indicating sign of an impending rain whereas a weather flag denotes a symbol of rain. Symbol can be explained through morpheme and phoneme. Morpheme stands for minimal indivisible grammatical unit such as the word ‘write’. Phonemes are units of sound that represent utterances. The terms etic and emic denote observational phenomenon. Words and objects are two isolates joined by human mind. Language and culture go together but language plays a more deterministic role. This covariance between language and social structure creates a new discipline called sociolinguistics. Key Words: philological tradition, anthropological linguistics, genetic transmission, lexemes, cultural inventory, morphemes etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 07, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me and colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
My humble request
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1