Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

JAGAN AND MALI IN R.K. NARAYAN’S 'VENDOR OF SWEETS': PARALLELS AND CONTRASTS (Pages 134-140) by Mrs. Priyanka Rai in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MP Updated
 
3.3
 
3.7 (1)
753 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2017/1St.Qr-17/134.140/411
Publication Year

The following review papers aims to examine and evaluate a plethora of sources inclusive of the original literary texts as well as their critiques in order to draw a sharp distinction as well as understand in a rudimentary fashion the overlapping tenets of the two major characters in the seminal piece of fiction, The Vendor of Sweets. The major axiom of differentiation between the two characters is the polar yet juxtaposed themes of tradition and modernity. The aforementioned character sketches are then briefly compared with that of Raju’s character in the iconic novel, The Guide. The review paper then concludes by taking into consideration numerous remarks that summarize the aspects of R.K. Narayan’s work’s critical appreciation. Keywords: plethora of sources, critiques, sharp distinction, rudimentary fashion, axiom of differentiation etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Let me know further
MP
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1