Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

EK ALAG MAUSAM-DISEASE H/AS DISGRACE (Pages 01-07) by Mr. R. Devanand in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MR Updated
 
3.6
 
3.4 (1)
568 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2014/1St.Qr-01/01.07/104
Publication Year
Author Name

Literary texts offer instant and absolute access to characters’ psychological states unlike the characters on celluloid. The ability to enter the minds of fictional characters is, of course, one of the credits of literary works. This paper makes a modest attempt to analyze a successful film adaptation of Mahesh Dattani’s play, ‘Ek Alag Mausam.’ But it is hard for movies to compete with literary texts in this regard. The socio-psychological impacts of AIDS on the infected people are studied from sociological perspective. It demands a critical enquiry into why it is so difficult to contain the spread of the disease. An NGO, ‘Action Aid’ made a film on AIDS titled 'Ek Alag Mausam.' AIDS related discrimination, stigmatization and denial can appear in a variety of forms, at various levels and in different contexts. Since death is difficult to represent, the crisis of AIDS becomes an existential problem. The experience of death perpetually remains unknowable. Anxiety associated with impending death in the case of AIDS therefore remains intact. Keywords: AIDS, Death, Discrimination, Screenplay, Stigmatization

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 12, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
My quick review
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Can be continued
MR
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1