Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

DERRIDA AND THE CONCEPT OF STRUCTURE: CRITICAL INTERPLAYS OF STRUCTURE AND DECONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURE- A REVIEW (Pages 76-97) by Prof. Pooja Mohanty in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

PP Updated
 
3.7
 
3.4 (1)
511 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2014/1St.Qr-10/76.97/113
Publication Year

The paper discusses the epoch making work, “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of Human Sciences” of French philosopher and critic, Jacques Derrida. An attempt is made to analyze and understand Derrida’s interpretations of how the concepts of ‘Structure’, ‘Sign’ and ‘Play’ are perceived by the different human sciences. Further an attempt is made to elaborate the questions raised by Derrida against the prevailing notions of structure and how a structure dismantles and undermines itself. A critical analysis of Derrida’s work discusses how these very established critical dogmas and conventions inherently contradict themselves. The deconstructive critic’s primary job is under question. The role of identity in a structure is also examined. Finally, an attempt is made to understand the complex interplays of ‘Construction’ or ‘Structure’ and ‘Deconstruction’ as perceived by Derrida which marked an impression on the Post-structuralist theory as well. Keywords: Structure, Sign, Play, Deconstruction, Human sciences, Critical theory

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 13, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me and colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please do the needful
PP
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1