Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

DANCE AS A CREATIVE ART EXPERIENCE IN R.K. NARAYAN’S 'THE GUIDE' AND KOTHAMANGALAM SUBBU’S 'PANDANALLUR BAMA' (Pages 28-50) by Ms. Sujatha Kumar in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MS Updated
 
3.3
 
3.6 (1)
527 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2019/1St.Qr-07/28.50/509
Publication Year

Literature and fine arts have always coexisted. The interconnectivity between these two art forms has resulted in the mutual illumination of both. Different novelists have exploited the convergence of literature and fine arts, in their books. Dance has been used to illustrate characterisation, development of plot, implication of imagery and as a catalyst for sexual euphemism by many authors. Reputed English novelist R.K.Narayan, who is known for his simple diction, has written about a dancer protagonist in his book, The Guide. Kothamangalam Subbu, who is a poet, lyricist, an author and a film director, has penned Pandanallur Bama, in Tamil, in which the protagonist is a dancer. Two novels, one in English and one in Tamil have been taken for this study, which exemplifies dance as a creative art, in the evolution of the character of the protagonist. The positive effect of the art in the lives of the protagonists as they manoeuvre through the adversities in their life, is analysed. Keywords: Interconnectivity, coexisted, mutual illumination, characterisation, sexual euphemism, catalyst, implication of imagery, creative art.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
4.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me at an instant
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Please proceed further
MS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1