Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

CRITICISM ON SHAKESPEARE’S LAST PLAYS (Pages 150-155) by Mr. Sunil N. Wathore in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MS Updated
 
3.7
 
3.4 (1)
473 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2015/2Nd.Qr-18/150.155/258
Publication Year

The aim of the present research paper is to highlight the differently held views regarding Criticism on Shakespeare’s Last Plays notably ‘Pericles’, Cymbeline’, ‘The Winter’s Tale’ and ‘The Tempest’ and discuss before the researchers and art lovers. Constructions in these last plays are mixed, grammatical links are dropped, the meaning of sentence is compressed into one hint and impressions count for as much as full blown prepositions. These plays reflect calm of mind and tranquility of spirit. Like the Medieval and Renaissance Romances, their stories are really farfetched fantasies with love as a central concern. Despite several criticisms on Shakespeare’s last plays, Shakespeare indeed as a dramatist employing the compound art form for his ends, he exhibits a phenomenal skill in the adjustment of the dramatic principle of imagination to the theatrical principle of technique. The diverse interpretation of Shakespeare’s last plays point to their complexity and profundity and suggests not only critical ingenuity but also a wide range of scholarship. Key-words: The Last Plays; Mature Vision; Secular Aspects of Human Life; Last Plays as Romances; Practical Problems & Theatrical Innovations; Rivalry.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

ReviewedbyEditorialBoard
(Updated: January 31, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfillsallcriteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me today
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please do the needful
MS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1