Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

ALLEGORICAL REPRESENTATION IN THE NOVEL 'SHAME' BY SALMAN RUSHDIE (Pages 188-193) by Ms. Asha. J in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MA Updated
 
3.4
 
3.7 (1)
631 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2016/4Th.Qr-20/188.193/393
Publication Year
Author Name

Indian Writing in English refers to Indian writers who write their fiction or any writing in Indian English. Writers like Mulk Raj Anand, Bhabani Bhattacharya, Nirad Chaudhuri, Anita Desai, Ruth Prawer Jhabvala, Manohar Malgonkar, Kamala Markandaya, R.K. Narayan, Raja Rao and Nissim Ezekiel have gained national and international reputation. Salman Rushdie established himself as one of the most powerful of modern novelists with his great six novels. Shame could be accounted under historical and political allegory. Rushdie while fictionalizing characters furnishes history of nation and he uses allegory in its full sense. Keywords: Indian Writing in English, international reputation, historical and political allegory, powerful of modern novelists, fictionalizing characters, furnishes history, etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Let me know further
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1