Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF REGRESSIVE ASSIMILATION IN STANDARD ENGLISH AND STANDARD ARABIC (Pages 68-83) by Mr. Abd Ali Nayif Hasan in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MA Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
484 0 0 0 1 0
Write Review Add to favorites Follow

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/3Rd.Qr-07/68.83/25
Publication Year
2013 3rd Quarter
Author Name
Mr. Abd Ali Nayif Hasan

The present study is concerned with regressive assimilation in Standard English and standard Arabic. A survey of literature is conducted to emphasize on contact, distant, partial, total, manner, voice, and prefix {in-} assimilation in English and optional minor assimilation in Arabic. Thus, a contrastive analysis is investigated to show the similarities and differences between regressive assimilation patterns in English and Arabic. Such analyses have proved that differences are more than similarities since certain sounds in English have no counterparts in Arabic and vise versa. Key Words: phonetics, segments, assimilation, sound, geminated, vowel, articulation, intensity, consonant, regressive, minor, optional, source, target, anticipation, leading, pronunciation, contact, distant, partial, total, manner, voice, prefix, sibilant, feminine, phonological and valorization

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 07, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
admin
#1 Reviewer 1409 reviews
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my colleagues
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
You can believe this review
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
      Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Category

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1