Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

HONING WRITING SKILLS OF TERTIARY LEVEL STUDENTS USING PEER FEEDBACK: FEW PERSPECTIVES (Pages 11-16) by Ms. Freeda Rajakumari and Dr. Pushpa Nagini Sripada in THE ENGLISH INDIA / ISSN: 2321-1172 (Online); 2347-2634 (Print)

MF Updated
 
3.6
 
3.3 (1)
738 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

Developing students’ writing skills are crucial as it is a medium for academic success. But , ESL learners struggled to improve their writing .The paper is based on the writing problems of the learners, concerned with teaching writing in Indian contexts at the tertiary level. The main aim of the paper is to present the advantages of peer feed back in ESL writing classes. The specific responses of peer will definitely motivate them to write better.eveloping students’ writing skills are crucial as it is a medium for academic success. But , ESL learners struggled to improve their writing .The paper is based on the writing problems of the learners, concerned with teaching writing in Indian contexts at the tertiary level. The main aim of the paper is to present the advantages of peer feed back in ESL writing classes. The specific responses of peer will definitely motivate them to write better.Key-words: Peer feedback, L2 learner. Writing skills etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my side
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
I have taken more care to prepare this
MF
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1